Segment
1. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo 2 vs. Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Esa-Tecar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Debica Frigo 2 and Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Frigo 2 and the Super Grip 9 were tested.
| # | Debica Frigo 2
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Interior noise
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
