• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Cooper (40%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 85% compared to 15% of the Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+. The first tyre test of Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the WeatherMaster SA2+ and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
/15%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
/85%

Add to comparison

Cooper
GoodYear
DimensionsR15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceRolling resistanceNoiseWear
Best values in test2,01,81,41,81,52,71,5
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
Rating: Sufficient
2,63,72,72,42,42,93,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Rating: Good
2,52,51,4 2,22,02,82,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
Rating: Conditionally recommended
23+3+3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Rating: Exemplary
22+1-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+34,626,1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+34,424,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+31,928,3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+30,624,3
Show test details