14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 53% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 870 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the WinterContact TS 870 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of Continental WinterContact TS 870 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 870 is made in France and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /53%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 16x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.75

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

89%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 64%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 69%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

88%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

86%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 89%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 85%

Comfort

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

88%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

67%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

75.8%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	2,1	2,4	1,6	1,9	2,1	2,8	2,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Very good	8,2	7,9	7,9	8,4	10	10
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Continental WinterContact TS 870	101,6	299,9	299,9	93,8	101,1	100,7
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands