14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Debica Frigo 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Continental WinterContact TS 860 and Debica Frigo 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the Frigo 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 99% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 has B wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Debica Frigo 2 has C rating. We also know where WinterContact TS 860 is made - Portugal/Slovakia.

#	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Debica Frigo 2 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

2. Debica Frigo 2 36

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Debica Frigo 2 1x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Debica Frigo 2 6.

Worst position in test

1. Debica Frigo 2 6.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Debica Frigo 2 6

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Debica Frigo 2 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Debica
Frigo 2

0%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 91%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 73%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Debica
Frigo 2

0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 94%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Debica Frigo 2 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Debica
Frigo 2

82%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Debica Frigo 2 78%

Snow braking

1. Debica Frigo 2 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Debica Frigo 2 80%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 93%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Debica
Frigo 2

61%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 80%

2. Debica Frigo 2 61%

Interior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

2. Debica Frigo 2 60%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 90%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Debica Frigo 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

78%

Mileage

1. Debica Frigo 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 77%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Debica Frigo 2 80%

Price/value

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 68%

2. Debica Frigo 2 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Debica Frigo 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo 2

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79%

Ice braking

1. Debica Frigo 2 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Debica Frigo 2 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 175/65 R14

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	2,0	1,8	2,4	3,2	1,5	1,6
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	1,7	2,3	1,8	2,5	3,5	2,0	2,2
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,9	2,2	2,5	3,5	2,0	2,2
Show test details

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Debica Frigo 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands