Segment
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Sava (62%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the WinterContact TS 850P SUV and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 61% of Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (59%) of the Sava Eskimo HP2 also have C wet ratings.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.93
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 1,5 | 2,2 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Show test details |