Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact Winter and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental VanContact Winter was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact Winter and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Continental VanContact Winter dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER also have B wet ratings.
# | Continental VanContact Winter
| BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |