Segment
2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
Comparison: Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Continental ContiSportContact 5 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 245/45 R18 test, where both the ContiSportContact 5 and the Ultrac Vorti were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Continental ContiSportContact 5
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Continental ContiSportContact 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: - | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 Rating: Good | 1,9 | 1,2 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
