Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 81% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza 6 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza 6 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | Kumho Ecsta HS52 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,1 | |||||
Show test details |