Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 87% compared to 82% of the Falken Azenis FK520. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2024 235/55 R18 test, where both the Turanza 6 and the Azenis FK520 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Bridgestone Turanza 6 | Falken Azenis FK520 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | |||||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
Show test details |