Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport SUV vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Potenza Sport SUV and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Potenza Sport SUV
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R21 - R21 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
