Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Vredestein Wintrac Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Vredestein (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 58% of the Vredestein Wintrac. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Vredestein Wintrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Wintrac were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and Wintrac is made in Hungary.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Vredestein Wintrac
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Vredestein Wintrac Premium
1. Vredestein Wintrac Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | 3.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 99.7 | ||||||
Vredestein Wintrac | 98.6 | ||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,7 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,0 |
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 3,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Good | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
Vredestein Wintrac | 33,5 | 30,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,7 | 9,6 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | 8,7 | 9,6 | 8,6 | 8,2 | 8 | 7 | |
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Very good | 8,1 | 7,8 | 8,5 | 8,2 | 7 | 9 | |
Show test details |