Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 has a better rating of 94% compared to 92% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter i*cept evo3 W330 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | |||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 2- | 3+ | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 35,2 | 30,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Test winner | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 1 | ||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
Show test details |