Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 50% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB