Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Show test details | |||||||
