14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Bridgestone (93%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO and Continental WinterContact TS 860, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R17	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 10

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 4x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 14.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 9.75

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

87%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 76%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 91%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 80%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 79%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

65%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 74%

Snow braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 71%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 50%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 63%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

82%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 79%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 82%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

87%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

77%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 86%

Comfort

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO 83%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO

86%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

81%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Points total
Best values in test	9,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Still recommended	7,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Highly recommended	9,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2-	3+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2018 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,1	2,0	1,8	2,3	3,0	1,0	1,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory	2,4	2,1	2,9	2,3	3,6	1,0	1,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Good	2,1	2,5	1,9	2,5	3,0	2,0	1,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO	34,3	29,8
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,5	27,6
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands