14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 98% compared to 84% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (81%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterContact TS 870 is made in France.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 /98%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 80

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 16x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 1.75

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 2024

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 93%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 74%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

87%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 84%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 83%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 60%

Mileage

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Price/value

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 68%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Continental WinterContact TS 870	37.1	29.1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,6	2,0	2,5	2,4	2,7	2,0
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good	2,1	2,3	2,2	2,5	1,8	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	1-	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Continental WinterContact TS 870	34,2	27,7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Very good	8,2	7,9	7,9	8,4	10	10
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands