Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Sava Intensa HP
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than BFGoodrich (41%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 22% of the Sava Intensa HP. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Sava Intensa HP first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of BFGoodrich Advantage has A wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Intensa HP has C rating.
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage | Sava Intensa HP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.752. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Sava Intensa HP ? dB