Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian Line
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Line also have A wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 72%
Wet braking
1. Nokian Line 84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry lane changing
1. Nokian Line 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 72%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Mileage
2. Nokian Line 63%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%
