Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian Line
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than BFGoodrich (41%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 76% compared to 35% of the Nokian Line. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Line also have A wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage | Nokian Line | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Line 12.172. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian Line 74%
Wet braking
2. Nokian Line 71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 79%
Wet handling
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian Line 80%
Dry handling
1. Nokian Line 83%
Dry lane changing
1. Nokian Line 85%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian Line 82%
Comfort
2. Nokian Line 60%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian Line ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian Line 78%
Mileage
1. Nokian Line 68%
Price/value
2. Nokian Line 30%