Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B rating.
# | Barum Polaris 3
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.62. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |