18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETIRELAB.COM

Comparison: Apollo Apterra HP vs. Nokian Line SUV (2026)

Apollo Apterra HPBudget
ApolloApollo

Apterra HP

R13 – R18
VS
Nokian Line SUVUpper-middle
NokianNokian

Line SUV

R15 – R19
Also compare with
Efficientgrip 2 SUV Roadhawk 2 Zeon 4XS Sport
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Apollo (40%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Apterra HP and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Apollo Apterra HP was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Apterra HP and the Line SUV were tested.

Test Profile

Apollo
Apterra HP
Nokian
Line SUV
Number of tests
1
5
Best position
#10
#2
Average position
10.0
4.2
Latest test
2017
2017
Available sizes
4
33

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 13 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Apollo Apterra HP
73%
Nokian Line SUV
97%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Apterra HP
71%
Nokian Line SUV
96%
Safety
Apollo Apterra HP
74%
Nokian Line SUV
97%
Wet
Confidence
Apollo Apterra HP
93%
Nokian Line SUV
98%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Apterra HP
95%
Nokian Line SUV
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Apterra HP
98%
Nokian Line SUV
99%
Wet braking
Apollo Apterra HP
95%
Nokian Line SUV
97%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Apterra HP
91%
Nokian Line SUV
99%
Wet handling
Apollo Apterra HP
87%
Nokian Line SUV
98%
Comfort
Confidence
Apollo Apterra HP
99%
Nokian Line SUV
96%
Exterior noise
Apollo Apterra HP
99%
Nokian Line SUV
96%
Interior noise
Apollo Apterra HP
99%
Nokian Line SUV
94%
Noise/Komfort
Apollo Apterra HP
99%
Nokian Line SUV
97%
Costs
Confidence
Apollo Apterra HP
97%
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Fuel efficiency
Apollo Apterra HP
98%
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Mileage
Apollo Apterra HP
96%
Nokian Line SUV
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2017215/65 R16View

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Apollo Apterra HP vs Firestone Roadhawk 2Apollo Apterra HP vs Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVApollo Apterra HP vs GoodYear Efficientgrip SUVNokian Line SUV vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUVNokian Line SUV vs Cooper Zeon 4XS SportNokian Line SUV vs Falken Ziex ZE-914Nokian Line SUV vs Continental ContiPremiumContact 5

Browse by brand

MichelinPirelliHankookNokianGoodyearNexenContinentalVredesteinFalkenKumhoMaxxisDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.