Segment
2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Apterra H/T2 vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Apollo (47%). In this particular case, the Continental SportContact 5 SUV has a better rating of 77% compared to 22% of the Apollo Apterra H/T2. The first tyre test of Apollo Apterra H/T2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental SportContact 5 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 265/60 R18 test, where both the Apterra H/T2 and the SportContact 5 SUV were tested.
| # | Apollo Apterra H/T2 | Continental SportContact 5 SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra H/T2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo Apterra H/T2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||