14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs. Vredestein Wintrac

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 65% compared to 58% of the Vredestein Wintrac. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Vredestein Wintrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the Wintrac were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Apollo Alnac 4G Winter /65%	Vredestein Wintrac /58%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R16	R15 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Wintrac Premium

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Vredestein Wintrac 38

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 31

Number of tests

1. Vredestein Wintrac 11x

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 2x

Best position in test

1. Vredestein Wintrac 3.

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 12.

Worst position in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 15.

2. Vredestein Wintrac 17.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Wintrac 8.36

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 13.5

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter 2024

2. Vredestein Wintrac 2024

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Wintrac Very good

2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Good

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Good

2. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G Winter

72%

Vredestein
Wintrac

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

69%

Apollo
Alnac 4G Winter

62%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G Winter

70%

Vredestein
Wintrac

69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Alnac 4G Winter

77%

Vredestein
Wintrac

77%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter ?

2. Vredestein Wintrac ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Wintrac

77%

Apollo
Alnac 4G Winter

73%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter	36.4	30.6
Vredestein Wintrac	37.3	30.2
Show test details