Segment
2. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Zeetex (21%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 96% compared to 21% of the Zeetex WH 1000. The first tyre test of Zeetex WH 1000 was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WH 1000 and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Zeetex WH 1000
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Zeetex WH 1000 Lowcost
2. Zeetex WH 1000 34.6
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended2. Zeetex WH 1000 Sufficient
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Zeetex WH 1000 Rating: Sufficient | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Zeetex WH 1000 | 42.3 | - | |||||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 36.9 | 29.4 | |||||
Show test details |