Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Yokohama (57%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 has a better rating of 74% compared to 55% of the Yokohama BluEarth-XT. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-XT was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R18 test, where both the BluEarth-XT and the Roadhawk 2 were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the BluEarth-XT is made in Japan and Roadhawk 2 is made in Italy.
# | Yokohama BluEarth-XT
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
Yokohama BluEarth-XT Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
Show test details |