Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Yokohama (57%). Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the BluEarth RV-02 and the Azenis FK510 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: - | 3.7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Rating: Very good - | 1.8 | 1.7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
