Segment
1. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake Z-107 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Westlake (36%). The first tyre test of Westlake Z-107 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Z-107 and the N Fera Primus were tested.
| # | Westlake Z-107
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
