18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Vredestein Wintrac vs. Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 (2026)

Vredestein is the well-rounded wet-weather winner; Yokohama suits dry winter roads only.

The Vredestein Wintrac and the Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 — successor to the W.drive V905 — are both pitched at drivers who want a capable, road-focused winter tyre. On paper they share a winter remit; in practice their characters diverge considerably. The Wintrac, replacing the Snowtrac 5, is the more rounded, comfort-oriented choice with notably strong wet credentials. The BluEarth-Winter V906 positions itself around dry precision and confident cleared-road handling, but it carries real weaknesses in wet and winter conditions that limit its overall case. Across four head-to-head tests, the Vredestein wins three.

Vredestein Wintrac
Good for
Drivers wanting balanced wet and winter performance Fuel-conscious drivers prioritising low rolling resistance Comfort-oriented drivers wanting a quiet winter tyre Mixed winter conditions in Central Europe
Not ideal for
Drivers needing a very wide size selection Those prioritising maximum snow traction above all High-mileage drivers expecting long tread life
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
Good for
Drivers in predominantly dry, cold winter climates Performance car owners prioritising dry handling feel SUV and crossover fitments needing wider size range
Not ideal for
Drivers in regions with heavy snowfall Fuel-conscious or EV drivers — high rolling resistance Those who regularly drive on wet roads in winter High-mileage drivers expecting long tread life

Test Profile

Vredestein
Wintrac
Yokohama
BluEarth-Winter V906
Number of tests
11
7
Best position
#3
#5
Average position
8.4
16.6
Latest test
2024
2023
Available sizes
43
14

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 25 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
99%
Dry braking
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
98%
Dry driving behavior
Vredestein Wintrac
90%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
98%
Safety
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
99%
Dry handling
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
100%

On dry roads, the Yokohama makes its most convincing argument. ADAC testers praised its safe and precise dry handling, and in the ADAC 2022 SUV test it finished fifth overall against the Wintrac's tenth — its single head-to-head win. The V906's robust bead construction and directional tread are specifically engineered for responsive dry-road behaviour, and the feedback reflects that. The Wintrac is no slouch in dry braking — its scores here are genuinely competitive — but testers have consistently flagged mild weaknesses in dry dynamics more broadly, particularly in lateral response. The Yokohama has the edge in dry composure; the Vredestein holds its own in straight-line stops.

Wet
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
96%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Wintrac
91%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
95%
Wet braking
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
93%
Wet handling
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
85%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Wintrac
99%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
96%

Wet performance is where the gap between these two becomes significant. In the Autobild 2021 braking test — the only head-to-head with measured distances — the Wintrac stopped from 80 km/h in 33.5 metres against the V906's 35.9 metres on wet tarmac, a meaningful 2.4-metre advantage in a real-world safety scenario. This pattern holds across all wet metrics: the Vredestein's aquaplaning resistance, wet handling, and wet safety margins consistently outclass the Yokohama. ADAC described the V906's wet performance as merely adequate, while the Wintrac earned specific praise for its aquaplaning reserves and balanced wet dynamics. Real owners back this up — one SEAT Cupra driver on country roads reported strong confidence in wet and icy conditions. The Yokohama's wet performance is simply not at the level its winter positioning suggests.

Snow
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
90%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
88%
Snow braking
Vredestein Wintrac
87%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
92%
Snow handling
Vredestein Wintrac
90%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
82%
Snow traction
Vredestein Wintrac
92%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
90%
Snow cornering
Vredestein Wintrac
89%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
86%

Snow is the one area where the Yokohama finds partial redemption. In the same Autobild 2021 braking test, the V906 stopped on snow in 29.2 metres versus the Wintrac's 30.3 metres — a marginal advantage. Its Adaptive 3D Sipes and V-shaped groove pattern are genuinely designed for traction on snow and slush, and Yokohama's own positioning highlights snow, ice and wet confidence as core strengths. However, ADAC's broader 2024 evaluation flagged the V906 for weaknesses in winter driving behaviour overall, limiting the scope of that snow-braking advantage. The Wintrac's snow scores are stronger in aggregate, and in the ADAC 2021 195/65 R16 test it placed fourth against the Yokohama's eleventh. The V906 can stop on snow; the Wintrac is the more consistent all-round winter performer.

Ice
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
94%
Ice braking
Vredestein Wintrac
100%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
94%
Comfort
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
92%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
96%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Wintrac
98%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
93%
Comfort
Vredestein Wintrac
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
99%

Away from grip metrics, the Wintrac pulls well clear. Its interior noise, rolling resistance, and ride comfort scores are all substantially higher than the Yokohama's — and this shows in real-world use. Owners consistently mention quiet operation as a stand-out trait, and the low rolling resistance translates to meaningful fuel savings over a winter season. The V906 carries a higher weight penalty, noted by ADAC, and its rolling resistance score reflects genuinely poor efficiency — a significant everyday ownership consideration. For drivers who cover real kilometres in winter and care about cabin comfort and running costs, the Vredestein is the more liveable tyre by a clear margin.

Costs
Confidence
Vredestein Wintrac
92%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
84%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Wintrac
98%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
86%
Mileage
Vredestein Wintrac
84%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
72%
Price/value
Vredestein Wintrac
93%
Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906
93%

Performance spider chart

Verdict

The Vredestein Wintrac is the rational choice for the vast majority of winter drivers — it wins three of four direct comparisons, stops shorter on wet roads, handles winter conditions more consistently, and is significantly quieter and more efficient to run. The only meaningful concession is marginally softer dry dynamics. The Yokohama BluEarth-Winter V906 is for a narrower audience: drivers in regions with predominantly cold-but-dry winters, who prioritise cleared-road handling above wet and snow capability. Its efficiency and mileage scores are poor enough that even those drivers should weigh the running costs carefully. For most winter conditions in Central and Northern Europe, the Wintrac is the better-rounded, more confident choice.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022215/60 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Winter
2021195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.