18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETIRELAB.COM

Comparison: Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 (2026)

Vredestein ULTRAC Premium
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

4.3
R15 – R21
VS
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.6
R13 – R20
4 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Vredestein (62%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 76% compared to 43% of the Vredestein ULTRAC . Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the ULTRAC and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where ULTRAC is made - Hungary.

Test Profile

Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
—
10
Best position
—
#2
Average position
—
6.0
Latest test
—
2026
Available sizes
83
117

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Wet Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet Circle Cornering
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning Cross
Vredestein ULTRAC
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Dry Handling
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Noise Interior
Vredestein ULTRAC
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Ride Comfort
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
Confidence
Vredestein ULTRAC
51%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Vredestein ULTRAC
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
45%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Vredestein ULTRAC vs Continental PremiumContact 7Vredestein ULTRAC vs Vredestein UltracVredestein ULTRAC vs Michelin Primacy 4+Vredestein ULTRAC vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Browse by brand

MichelinPirelliHankookNokianGoodyearNexenContinentalVredesteinKumhoFalkenMaxxisDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.