Segment
1. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost2. Westlake Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Viking Protech NewGen vs. Westlake Z-107
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake). Generally, Westlake summer tyres are slightly better rated (36%) than Viking (28%). The first tyre test of Viking Protech NewGen was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Westlake Z-107 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Protech NewGen and the Z-107 were tested.
| # | Viking Protech NewGen
| Westlake Z-107
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Westlake Z-107 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Good | 2,5 | 3,4 | |||||
| Westlake Z-107 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
