Segment
1. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Viking Protech NewGen vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Viking Protech NewGen
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The following comparison analyses two different tyres: the Viking Protech NewGen and the Sava Intensa UHP 2. Both of these tyres are prominent models produced by notable manufacturers Viking and Sava, respectively, with neither having been replaced by newer models.
The Viking Protech NewGen, although not achieving remarkable ratings overall (28%), did secure some success in certain areas. Notably, during ADAC's testing, it was identified that this model's best feature is its fuel efficiency. However, significant challenges were flagged on both dry and wet surfaces, underlining its overall performance weakness.
Switching our attention to the Sava Intensa UHP 2, this tyre delivers a notably better performance, reflected by its overall rating of 67%. It has excelled in numerous tests, securing the 15th position out of 51 in the Autobild test, and the 12th position out of 17 in the ADAC test.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2's strengths lie in its excellent aquaplaning safety reserves, stable dry surface handling, and short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces. In addition to its performance benefits, reviewers also found this tyre to be comfortable and competitively priced.
Although high wear rates and weaknesses on wet surfaces were observed, the tyre's quiet exterior noise has been complimented. The dual advantage of comfort and performance gives this tyre an edge over the Viking Protech NewGen, which fails to balance these crucial aspects.
In conclusion, drawing from the comparisons and test results, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 outperforms the Viking Protech NewGen in overall performance, testament to its higher rating and placement in several tyre tests. Subsequently, potential customers are likely to find the Sava Intensa UHP 2 a more compelling purchase.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.862. Viking Protech NewGen 32.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Viking ProTech NewGen | 37.6 | 33.5 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Viking ProTech NewGen | 70.4 | 31.3 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Viking Protech NewGen | 39,8 | 33,4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Viking Protech NewGen Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
