Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Viking ProTech HP Lowcost
Comparison: Viking ProTech HP vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Viking (28%). But when it comes to comparing Viking ProTech HP and Bridgestone Potenza S001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Viking ProTech HP was done in 2020, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the ProTech HP and the Potenza S001 were tested.
| # | Viking ProTech HP
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Viking ProTech HP | 37,3 | 34,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
