Segment
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium2. Viking CityTech II Lowcost
Comparison: Viking CityTech II vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Viking (28%). But when it comes to comparing Viking CityTech II and Michelin Energy Saver +, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Viking CityTech II was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Energy Saver + first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the CityTech II and the Energy Saver + were tested.
| # | Viking CityTech II
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Viking CityTech II | 39,3 | 39,6 | |||||
| Michelin Energy Saver + | 37,5 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
