Segment
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Uniroyal winter tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Uniroyal MS plus 77, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Uniroyal MS plus 77 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the MS plus 77 were tested.
| # | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Uniroyal MS plus 77
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
