Segment
1. Toyo Celsius Upper-middle2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Toyo (54%). The first tyre test of Toyo Celsius was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R16 test, where both the Celsius and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Celsius is made in Japan and HA32 Solus 4S is made in China.
# | Toyo Celsius
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Toyo Celsius Upper-middle2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
2. Toyo Celsius 24.
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.782. Toyo Celsius 12.86
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Toyo Celsius Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3+ | 2 | ||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Toyo Celsius | 44,9 | 53 | |||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
Show test details |