Segment
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Sava (61%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the ACTIVAN WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B rating.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S | BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
2. Sava TRENTA M+S 73 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended | 4,9 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,7 |
Show test details |