Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (62%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Intensa UHP and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava Intensa UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Intensa UHP and the zLine were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Sava Intensa UHP has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian zLine has A rating.
| # | Sava Intensa UHP
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
