Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Eskimo S3+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Kumho (61%). The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
