Segment
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Debica (50%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Eskimo S3+ and Debica Frigo 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Sava Eskimo S3+ was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Eskimo S3+ and the Frigo 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of Sava Eskimo S3+ dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Debica Frigo 2 also have C wet ratings.
# | Sava Eskimo S3+
| Debica Frigo 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost2. Debica Frigo 2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory
1. Debica Frigo 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,7 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Debica Frigo 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |