Comparison: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 (2026)

On dry roads, both tyres are closely matched in overall capability, though they have different weaknesses. The Semperit shows better dry handling precision in independent assessments, with testers consistently noting balanced, predictable responses. The Sava, by contrast, has drawn repeated criticism for imprecision near the limit on dry surfaces — it is safe but not sharp. In terms of dry braking distances, the Sava's absolute stopping score is slightly stronger in the data, but this advantage doesn't translate into real-world test standings, where the Semperit consistently places higher in overall dry assessments. For most drivers, neither tyre will feel limiting on dry winter roads, but those who value a more confident, precise dry feel will prefer the Semperit.

Wet performance is where the two tyres diverge most clearly, and where the Semperit's advantage is most decisive. In the AUTOBILD 2024 braking test — the only direct head-to-head with measured distances — the Semperit stopped from speed in 36.8 metres on wet against the Sava's 39.5 metres, a gap that matters in emergency situations. The Semperit also leads in aquaplaning resistance and wet handling composure, with testers praising its safe, precise wet-road behaviour across multiple test years. The Sava's wet weakness is well-established and recurring — it was flagged as a downgrade-worthy shortcoming in two consecutive ADAC evaluations. Real-world owners of the Sava generally report acceptable wet behaviour for normal driving, but the objective data tells a consistent story: if wet roads are a priority, the Semperit is the safer tyre.

This is the Sava's strongest suit. Its snow and ice scores are slightly higher overall, and independent tests have rewarded it for secure, confident winter traction. In the one shared snow braking test (AUTOBILD 2024), the two tyres were extremely close — the Sava stopping in 29.6 metres against the Semperit's 29.1 metres — essentially even. Where the Sava shines more distinctly is ice lateral guidance and ice braking, where it scores very strongly. Real-world owners praise its grip on snow and ice as exceptional, with one Passat driver noting it held firm at low temperatures where a summer tyre had completely lost lateral grip. The Semperit is still a solid winter performer — ADAC has confirmed its safety on winter surfaces — but the Sava holds a genuine edge in the coldest, most challenging conditions.

The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 is noticeably more refined to live with. Its comfort scores are substantially higher, and noise levels — both interior and exterior — are significantly better rated than the Sava's. Some Sava owners have commented on higher cabin noise, which aligns with the test data. The Semperit's rolling resistance is marginally better, and its fuel efficiency profile is equally strong — ADAC awarded it the best fuel consumption score in multiple evaluations. Where the Sava does pull ahead is projected mileage: its wear resistance is among the best in its class, and ADAC flagged very low abrasion as a standout positive. The Semperit's mileage score is more modest. For daily driving comfort, the Semperit wins clearly; for those wanting the tyre to last as long as possible, the Sava has a real advantage.