Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Sailun summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Vredestein (34%). In this particular case, the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 has a better rating of 66% compared to 21% of the Vredestein ULTRAC . The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Vredestein ULTRAC first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the ULTRAC were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Vredestein ULTRAC
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory2. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC Rating: Sufficient | 3,83 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
