Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Sailun) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Sailun summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 66% of the Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2. The first tyre test of Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Atrezzo ZSR 2 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested.
| # | Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 3,1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
