Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Nokian Line
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine and Nokian Line, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Line first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Line also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian Line 17.2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
1. Nokian Line 87%2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%2. Nokian Line 80%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%2. Nokian Line 72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian Line 84%2. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%2. Nokian Line 84%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%2. Nokian Line 83%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%2. Nokian Line 72%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%2. Nokian Line 78%
