Segment
1. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian zLine SUV vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Yokohama (57%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian zLine SUV and Yokohama Advan Fleva V701, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian zLine SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the zLine SUV and the Advan Fleva V701 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian zLine SUV
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
