Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 4 vs. Nokian WR D4
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 4 and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 4 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR SUV 4 is made in Russian Federation and WR D4 is made in Finland.
| # | Nokian WR SUV 4
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR D4 6.04
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
1. Nokian WR D4 70%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR D4 72%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
Snow braking
2. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow handling
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
Snow cornering
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR D4 78%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
Comfort
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
2. Nokian WR D4 85%
