Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). The first tyre test of Nokian WR D4 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR D4 is made in Finland and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.
# | Nokian WR D4
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
2. Nokian WR D4 81%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 78%
2. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
1. Nokian WR D4 76%
2. Nokian WR D4 70%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 94%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
1. Nokian WR D4 86%
2. Nokian WR D4 67%
1. Nokian WR D4 99%
2. Nokian WR D4 79%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
1. Nokian WR D4 82%