Segment
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter has a better rating of 48% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the Comtrac 2 Winter were tested.
# | Nokian WR C3 | Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Still recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
Show test details |