Segment
1. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. In this particular case, the Nokian WR SUV 4 has a better rating of 65% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR C3 | Nokian WR SUV 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
Dry handling
2. Nokian WR C3 53%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB2. Nokian WR SUV 4 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
2. Nokian WR C3 43%