Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Profil Tyres Prosport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Profil Tyres Prosport 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Profil). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Profil (1%). The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Profil Tyres Prosport 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the WetProof and the Tyres Prosport 2 were tested. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WetProof | Profil Tyres Prosport 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Nokian WetProof | 101,3 | 102,2 | 100,4 | ||||
| Profil Tyres Prosport 2 | 85,7 | 80,6 | 90,9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||