Segment
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 has a better rating of 67% compared to 55% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Intensa UHP 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Sava Intensa UHP 2 also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | ||||
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Still recommended | 7,3 | 8,0 | 8,4 | ||||
Show test details |