Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Nokian Powerproof has a better rating of 52% compared to 48% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof has A wet grip rating, whereas 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof is made in Finland and EcoContact 6 is made in Germany.
# | Nokian Powerproof
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R6 - R66 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1- | 2 | 3- | ||||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Show test details |